Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
SUMMARY This paper investigates two different longitudinal control policies for automatically controlled vehicles. One is based on maintaining a constant spacing between the vehicles while the other is based upon maintaining a constant headway (or time) between successive vehicles. To avoid collisions in the platoon, controllers have to be designed to ensure string stability, i.e the spacing errors should not get amplified as they propagate upstream from vehicle to vehicle. A measure of string stability is introduced and a systematic method of designing constant spacing controllers which guarantee string stability is presented. The constant headway policy does not require inter-vehicle communication to assure string stablity. Also, since inter-vehicle communication is not required it can be used in systems with mixed automated-nonautomated vehicles, e.g for AICC (Autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control). It is shown in this paper that for all the autonomous headway control laws, the desired control torques are inversely proportional to the headway time.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
D. Swaroop
University of Mysore
J. Karl Hedrick
University of Cincinnati
Chih‐Ching Chien
Bioengineering Center
Vehicle System Dynamics
University of California, Berkeley
University of Southern California
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Swaroop et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff945f2ff633f36577989c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119408969077
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: