Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Poultry production generates large amounts of litter or manure, which can be a valuable source of P for crops. However, litter application rates are usually based on data for mineral P fertilizer recommendations. In order to determine if this is agronomically and environmentally sound, the availability, fractions, and sorptivity of P from poultry litter or KH 2 PO 4 were determined in six Oklahoma soils following incubation for up to 28 d. An average 50% more P from KH 2 PO 4 ‐treated (78 mg kg −1 ) than from leachate‐treated soils (52 mg kg −1 ) was bioavailable, as determined by extraction with Fe‐oxide‐impregnated paper strips, after 28‐d incubations. Conversely, more NaHCO 3 ‐extractable P was found in leachate‐treated (66 mg kg −1 ) than KH 2 PO 4 ‐treated soils (42 mg kg −1 ). Calculated from Langmuir isotherms, P sorption maxima averaged 548 mg kg −1 for leachate‐treated and 304 mg kg −1 for KH 2 PO 4 ‐treated soils, while binding energies averaged 0.527 and 0.456 L mg −1 , respectively. The higher P sorption maxima and binding energies of leachate‐treated soils may result from the formation of Ca‐P complexes, given the increased Ca content of these soils. The different reaction in soil of P added as poultry litter leachate to that added as KH 2 PO 4 , indicates manure application rates should be based on soil tests that are sensitive to P source‐dependent sorption characteristics and/or manure trials, and not just on mineral fertilizer trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinson et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: