In this paper, the performance of different technology photovoltaic (PV) systems was modeled using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) processes. Measurements from mono-crystalline (mono-c-Si), multi-crystalline (multi-c-Si) and amorphous (a-Si) silicon, cadmium telluride (CdTe) and copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) systems were used to construct monthly dc performance ratio (PR) time-series, from outdoor measurements. Each PR time-series was modeled a) with multiplicative ARIMA, b) with linear regression and c) with Seasonal-Trend Decomposition by Loess (STL) using the first 4 years of each time-series in order to compare the accuracy of the different methods. The models were used to forecast the PR of the 5 th year of the different PV technologies and the results from the aforementioned statistical methods were compared based on the root-mean-square error (RMSE). The results showed that ARIMA produced the lowest RMSE for crystalline silicon (c-Si) technologies, whereas for thin-film technologies, STL was more accurate. The results from ARIMA also showed that thin-film technologies were optimally modeled with identical model orders, whereas for c-Si, each technology required a different optimal model order.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phinikarides et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: