This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
An understanding of transonic flutter is often critical for high-speed aircraft development. A presentation of the transonic flutter velocity as a function of the Mach number and mass ratio is shown here to provide many advantages. Such a presentation offers new insights when comparing computational and wind-tunnel flutter results. The benefits of such a presentation are also evident in parameter studies. Finally, the subject of flutter similarity rules for airfoils of different thicknesses is also addressed. Nomenclature a = nondimensional location of airfoil elastic axis, e/b a0 = stagnation speed of sound b, c = semichord and chord, respectively e = location of airfoil elastic axis, measured positive aft of airfoil midchord h = airfoil plunge degree of freedom (DOF) Iα = second moment of inertia about elastic axis Kh, Kα = airfoil plunge stiffness and torsional stiffness about elastic axis, respectively L = aerodynamic lift M = freestream Mach number Mea = aerodynamic moment about elastic axis m = airfoil sectional mass rα = radius of gyration of airfoil about elastic axis; r 2 α is identical to Iα/mb 2
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kholodar et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: