Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To estimate the use of epidural analgesia and experienced pain during childbirth after a short antenatal training course in self‐hypnosis to ease childbirth. Design Randomised, controlled, single‐blinded trial using a three‐arm design. Setting A arhus U niversity H ospital S kejby in D enmark during the period J uly 2009 until A ugust 2011. Population A total of 1222 healthy nulliparous women. Method Use of epidural analgesia and self‐reported pain during delivery was compared in three groups: a hypnosis group receiving three 1‐hour lessons in self‐hypnosis with additional audiorecordings to ease childbirth, a relaxation group receiving three 1‐hour lessons in various relaxation methods and mindfulness with audiorecordings for additional training, and a usual care group receiving ordinary antenatal care only. Main outcome measures Primary outcome: Use of epidural analgesia. Secondary outcomes included self‐reported pain. Results There were no between‐group differences in use of epidural analgesia—31.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI ] 27.1–35.3) in the hypnosis group, 29.8% (95% CI 25.7–33.8) in the relaxation group and 30.0% (95% CI 24.0–36.0) in the control group. No statistically significant differences between the three groups were observed for any of the self‐reported pain measures. Conclusion In this large randomised controlled trial of a brief course in self‐hypnosis to ease childbirth, no differences in use of epidural analgesia or pain experience were found across study groups. Before turning down self‐hypnosis as a method for pain relief, further studies are warranted with focus on specific subgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Werner et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: