Does the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a-based assay improve the sensitivity and specificity of detecting Porcine Rotavirus compared to qPCR?
The RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a-based assay provides a rapid, highly sensitive, and specific visual detection method for Porcine Rotavirus without the need for large-scale instrumentation.
Piglet diarrhea poses significant economic losses to the pig industry, posing a worldwide challenge that urgently needs to be addressed in pig breeding practices. Porcine rotavirus (PoRV) is an important viral diarrhea pathogen in piglets, with a high incidence rate and a tendency to cause growth retardation. To enhance the sensitivity and specificity of PoRV detection, we sequenced the NSP3 gene of G5 and G9 genotypes of rotavirus A (RVA), enabling simultaneous detection of the two serotypes. Subsequently, we developed a rapid PoRV detection method using a combination of recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) and CRISPR/Cas12a. In this method, Cas12a binds to RAA amplification products, guided by CRISPR-derived RNA (crRNA), which activates its cleavage activity and releases fluorescence by cutting FAM-BHQ-labeled single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). In the optimized reaction system, the recombinant plasmid PoRV can achieve a highly sensitive reaction within 30 min at 37 °C, with a detection limit as low as 2.43 copies/μL, which is ten times higher in sensitivity compared to the qPCR method. Results from specificity testing indicate that no cross-reactivity was observed between the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a analysis of PoRV and other viral pathogens, including PoRV G3, PoRV G4, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), porcine epidemic diarrhea (PDCoV), and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). In the clinical sample detection using the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a method and qPCR, Cohen's Kappa value reached as high as 0.952. Furthermore, this approach eliminates the need for large-scale instrumentation, offering a visual result under an ultraviolet lamp through fluorescence signal output.
Huang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: