Why the study?
Does ticagrelor prevent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes compared with currently recommended treatment regimens?
Does ticagrelor prevent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes compared with currently recommended treatment regimens?
This review highlights ticagrelor as a novel, reversible P2Y12 inhibitor that provides greater antiplatelet effect and improved ischemic outcomes in ACS patients compared to standard therapies, though with increased nonprocedure-related bleeding.
Supports ticagrelor preference in ACS with ischemic benefit and major bleeding neutrality; leaves open bleeding risk stratification in practice.
Inhibition of the platelet ADP P2Y(12) receptor has shown to be associated with a marked risk reduction of atherothrombotic events in high-risk settings, including patients with acute coronary syndromes and those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Clinical and laboratory experiences have led to a better comprehension of the drawbacks of currently available P2Y(12) receptor antagonists, stimulating the development of novel agents. Ticagrelor (AZD6140) is the first drug of a new chemical class called cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine, which is administered orally and has a reversible P2Y(12) receptor inhibitory effect. Preclinical and early-phase clinical studies have shown ticagrelor to be characterized by a rapid, greater and consistent antiplatelet effect with a favorable safety profile. Recent findings from large-scale Phase III trials showed ticagrelor to be more effective in preventing ischemic events in acute coronary syndrome patients without an increased risk of protocol-defined major bleeding, but with an increase in the rate of nonprocedure-related bleeding, compared with currently recommended treatment regimens. This article provides an overview of the pharmacologic properties and clinical development of ticagrelor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capodanno et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: