PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1984Circulation737 citationsOpen Access

Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window.

View Full Paper
JLJannet F. LewisLKLawrence C. KuoJNJeanne G. Nelson

Structured PICO

Do pulsed Doppler echocardiographic methods (mitral inflow and left ventricular outflow) accurately measure stroke volume and cardiac output compared to thermodilution?

P
Population
39 patients, 33 of whom were in an intensive care unit.
I
Intervention
Pulsed Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography using two methods from the apical window: a mitral inflow method and a left ventricular outflow method.
C
Comparator
Thermodilution technique.
O
Outcome
Correlation of stroke volume and cardiac output measurements between Doppler methods and thermodilution.surrogate

Pulsed Doppler echocardiography using apical window methods provides accurate, non-invasive measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output compared to thermodilution in patients without significant valvular regurgitation.

Limitations

  • Validation of the mitral method excluded patients with mitral regurgitation (n = 11)
  • Validation of the left ventricular outflow method excluded patients with aortic regurgitation (n = 4)
  • Greater interobserver variability with the mitral anulus method due to variability in measuring annular diameter

Abstract

Two methods of measuring stroke volume and cardiac output with pulsed Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography were developed and validated against the thermodilution technique in 39 patients, 33 of which were in an intensive care unit. With the use of the apical four-chamber view, a mitral inflow method combined the velocity of left ventricular inflow at the mitral anulus with the cross-sectional area of the anulus calculated from its diameter at middiastole (area = pi r2). From the apical five-chamber view a left ventricular outflow method combined the velocity of left ventricular outflow with the cross-sectional area of the aortic anulus calculated from its diameter during early systole (parasternal long-axis view). Measurements with the mitral inflow and left ventricular outflow methods were obtained in 35 of 39 (90%) and 39 of 39 (100%) patients, respectively. Validation of the mitral method excluded patients with mitral regurgitation (n = 11) and validation of the left ventricular outflow method excluded those with aortic regurgitation (n = 4). Good correlations were observed between thermodilution and Doppler measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output for both the mitral anulus method (R = .96 and .87, respectively) and the left ventricular outflow method (R = .95 and .91, respectively). The results of the two methods correlated well with each other in patients without regurgitant valve lesions. A greater interobserver variability was observed with the mitral anulus method, which was related solely to greater variability in measuring the annular diameter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lewis et al. (1984) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ffcbe4d1d8b50f8e9a0fe5https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.70.3.425
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper