This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Psychological research is mainly concerned with causal questions, and as a consequence can benefit from explicitly adopting a causal inference framework. In this paper, I explain that the main contribution of longitudinal analysis from a causal perspective is the ability to control for time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity, which can be achieved by focusing exclusively on within-person variation. Based on this general framework, I describe different procedures for estimating within-person effects, as well as modelling strategies that can be used to test substantive hypotheses regarding within-person asymmetrical causation, moderation, effect heterogeneity, and reciprocal causation. These statistical techniques can expand the methodological tool kit for describing mechanisms using observational data. I provide an empirical illustration of these methods by estimating the within-person effects of executive functions on academic achievement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafael Quintana (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: