Why the study?
The complex interplay between endothelial dysfunction and systemic arterial hypertension carries relevant repercussions on cardiovascular risk, warranting a summary of its pathophysiology, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic implications.
This review highlights the role of endothelial dysfunction as a key pathogenic mechanism and biomarker in arterial hypertension, emphasizing personalized therapeutic strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support personalized endothelial-targeted strategies in hypertension; leaves open prospective validation of pharmacological and rehabilitation approaches.
The endothelium is composed of a monolayer of endothelial cells, lining the interior surface of blood and lymphatic vessels. Endothelial cells display important homeostatic functions, since they are able to respond to humoral and hemodynamic stimuli. Thus, endothelial dysfunction has been proposed as a key and early pathogenic mechanism in many clinical conditions. Given the relevant repercussions on cardiovascular risk, the complex interplay between endothelial dysfunction and systemic arterial hypertension has been a matter of study in recent years. Numerous articles have been published on this issue, all of which contribute to providing an interesting insight into the molecular mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in arterial hypertension and its role as a biomarker of inflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular disease. The prognostic and therapeutic implications of endothelial dysfunction have also been analyzed in this clinical setting, with interesting new findings and potential applications in clinical practice and future research. The aim of this review is to summarize the pathophysiology of the relationship between endothelial dysfunction and systemic arterial hypertension, with a focus on the personalized pharmacological and rehabilitation strategies targeting endothelial dysfunction while treating hypertension and cardiovascular comorbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambrosino et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: