Snakes have very different ecologies and habits from other non-ophidian squamates (“lizards”); yet ecological data from sympatric populations of lizards are often used as models to explain resource partitioning in sympatric groups of all squamates. Most snake assemblages show greatest ecological divergence in use of dietary resources. We use dietary, spatial, and reproductive data in a clade of five sympatric snake species with similar ecologies to test previous assumptions of how snakes partition resources in a species-rich community. Species show dietary specializations, with species of Simoselaps and Brachyurophis fasciolatus feeding exclusively on lizards and Brachyurophis semifasciatus eating only squamate eggs. Some species show trends regarding differential habitat use; Simoselaps bertholdi and B. semifasciatus are habitat generalists, whereas the other species are not captured in flat areas between sand ridges. Time of peak activity is not partitioned seasonally because all species, except B. fasciolatus, are most active in December. Partitioning of dietary resources is a stronger structuring agent than is partitioning of habitat resources in this community as indicated by the amount of resource overlap. Diet is the most important dimension in explaining ecological divergence among these elapid species, in agreement with prior studies of resource partitioning in snake assemblages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goodyear et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: