BACKGROUND: Long-term studies on arthroscopic repair of large subscapularis (SSC) tears over the first facet with or without supraspinatus (SSP) tear are limited. PURPOSE: To assess the structural and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair of large SSC tears using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and identify the factors related to SSC retear and poor outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: This study involved 109 patients (84.0 ± 36.2 months of follow-up) who underwent arthroscopic repair of large SSC tears (Yoo and Rhee classification type III [n = 81] or IV [n = 28]) between 2011 and 2019. All patients underwent MRI at 6.1 ± 0.4 months after surgery, and 79 of 109 patients (72.5%) were followed up over 7 years. Clinical outcomes (active range of motion, functional scores, and belly press strength) and final poor clinical outcomes (reoperation, osteoarthritic change, and poor clinical outcome) were recorded. SSP tear size, rotator cuff atrophy and fatty infiltration (Goutallier classification), SSC tendon integrity (intact, intermediate, definite tear), and SSP tendon integrity (Sugaya classification) were evaluated by MRI. RESULTS: = .031) were independent factors. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic repair of large SSC tears has shown promising structural outcomes for type III tears but not type IV tears. SSC retear was affected by SSC atrophy, as well as SSP tear size and atrophy. Approximately one-third of the final poor clinical outcomes could be predicted, and SSC retear, SSP retear, and female sex were associated with long-term poor clinical outcomes, underscoring the importance of carefully selecting patients for arthroscopic repair of large SSC tears.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: