Randomized trial compares neurofeedback-assisted meditation and traditional meditation, showing no significant differences in efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigated the comparative efficacy of two active mindfulness interventions, neurofeedback-assisted meditation and traditional guided meditation. METHODS: 21) were also collected from the neurofeedback group to determine acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the 8-week intervention, regardless of the method, was ineffective in producing statistically meaningful group differences. While acceptability was high, the inclusion of consumer-grade neurofeedback provided no measurable advantage over traditional guided meditation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jahani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: