Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey examines caregiver hope and its impact on mental health and quality of life, suggesting a need for interventions.
BACKGROUND: Caregivers of people with metastatic cancer often experience strain that interferes with personal goals, potentially affecting their mental health and quality of life. Hope interventions, which support goal-directed thinking and action, may be a promising approach to support caregivers' goals, mental health, and quality of life. This study examined the relation between caregiver hope, goal interference, and mental health and quality of life outcomes, characterized caregiver goals, and determined interest in hope interventions. METHODS: = 60) completed a cross-sectional survey, including open-ended questions regarding caregiver goals. Open-ended responses were analyzed using hybrid deductive-inductive content analysis to identify themes in caregiver goals. Descriptive statistics characterized caregiver interest and preferences for a hope intervention. Mediation analyses examined relations between hope, goal interference, and mental health. Most caregivers (81.7%) expressed interest in a hope-enhancing intervention, preferring flexible delivery formats (e.g. online or phone-based). CONCLUSIONS: Hope interventions, which equip people with cognitive behavioral skills to pursue goals, may be a promising approach to support caregivers' goals, mental health, and quality of life during caregiving for metastatic cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feather et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: