PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026Journal of Public Affairs0 citations

Bridging the Gap: Embedding Ecosystem Services Into Urban Development Plans for Resilient Cities

View Full Paper
NMNajme Sadat MostafaviZAZahra AsadolahiDCDaryoush Moradi Chadegani

Key Points

  • The research aims to identify barriers to integrating ecosystem services into urban development plans and propose a framework for their inclusion.
  • Conducted a qualitative meta-synthesis of 47 articles
  • Facilitated focus group sessions with 12 experts
  • Categorized challenges into structural, epistemic, and economic domains
  • Identified key barriers including institutional weaknesses in regulatory frameworks
  • Found limited organizational flexibility and insufficient expert capacity
  • Proposed a 10-step framework to enhance policy coherence and stakeholder engagement

Abstract

ABSTRACT Urban areas increasingly face environmental and socio‐economic challenges resulting from rapid urbanization and the degradation of natural systems. Despite widespread recognition of the importance of Ecosystem Services (ES), many Urban Development Plans (UDPs) remain rigid and context‐insensitive, limiting their capacity to support ecological resilience. This study aims to identify barriers to integrating ES into UDPs and to propose a practical framework for embedding ES principles into urban planning. To ensure methodological coherence and analytical rigor, the study focused exclusively on a qualitative meta‐synthesis of 47 articles. Using this approach, and complemented by a series of focus group sessions with 12 experts, the research categorizes challenges into three thematic domains: structural, epistemic, and economic. The findings reveal institutional weaknesses in regulatory frameworks, limited organizational flexibility, and insufficient expert capacity as key barriers. Based on these insights, a 10‐step framework anchored in the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) is proposed to guide planners in aligning ecological, social, and governance priorities. Using Iran as a case study, the paper demonstrates how this structured, participatory model can enhance policy coherence, stakeholder engagement, and adaptive management. The proposed framework offers a replicable pathway for embedding ES into urban planning processes, supporting more resilient and sustainable urban futures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mostafavi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002126c8f74e3340f9bf53https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.70133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessing the ecological balance between supply and demand of blue-green infrastructure2021 · 96 citations
  2. 2Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services2005 · 1,291 citations
  3. 3The impacts of comprehensive urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta, China2021 · 50 citations
  4. 4Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification2014 · 717 citations
  5. 5The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation2014 · 452 citations