Food insecurity persists in Ecuador, and organizations like the Quito Food Bank (BAQ) are key to mitigating it. This study evaluatesBAQ’s management from a sustainability perspective, analyzing its social, economic, and environmental impacts in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A mixed, exploratory, and descriptive case study approach was employed. Data collection included direct observation, a review of internal records, and semi-structured surveys administered to 240 volunteers. The environmental impact was quantified using a “gate-to-gate” Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with OpenLCA software and the ReCiPe 2016 methodology, while The social and economic analysis was conducted in R, using non-parametric statistical tests. The LCA identified storage as the main critical environmental, responsible for over 80% of the impacts due to high-energy consumption for refrigeration. Socially and economically, the BAQ’s food basket provides significant savings for beneficiary households, allowing them to redirect resources to other essential needs. However, this assistance is only partial and does not generate full economic security. The study highlights the duality of the BAQ’s operations: while food redistribution generates social and environmental benefits by reducing waste, it has its own environmental footprint due to the use of energy resources. A more holistic perspective is therefore proposed to ensure these interventions are truly sustainable in the long term.
Cárdenas-Erazo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: