Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supplementary appendix provides detailed proofs and expansions on decentralisation and security models, supporting findings from the conference paper.
This document is the standalone supplementary appendix to the conference paper “The DecentralisationThreshold: When More Validators Reduce Net Security” (SmartNets 2026). Itcontains complete proofs of every theorem and proposition stated in the paper, full derivationsof the closed-form approximation including the Lambert W algebra, a self-contained proof ofthe binomial anti-concentration lemma at the BFT threshold, the Jensen / AM-GM derivationof the heterogeneous Chernoff bound, comparative-statics derivatives, and reproducibility codelistings for every figure, every numerical table, and the heterogeneous Poisson-binomial example.The appendix is self-contained: it restates the model and all definitions in full, so it can be readindependently of the conference paper. It is archived at Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.20078799.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craig Wright (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: