Retrospective study evaluates genetic factors affecting growth in children with diagnosed GHD, suggesting current diagnostics may be limited.
Context Growth hormone (GH) stimulation tests have limited reliability, and may lead to false-positive results. Objective Evaluate genetic causes of short stature in children clinically diagnosed with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and assess genotype-phenotype correlations. Design, settings and patients A retrospective single-center study including 233 children with clinically diagnosed primary growth hormone deficiency (GHD) treated with GH for ≥5 years. Genetic testing was performed using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel of 398 growth-associated genes. Results A genetic cause was identified in 39/233 (17%) children. Only 13/39 (33%) findings confirmed GHD (genes CHD7, GH1, GHSR, GLI2, GNAO1, KMT2D, OTX2 [3], POU1F1, PROP1, SALL4, TBX3). The remaining 26/39 (67%) revealed alternative etiologies of growth failure: RASopathies (13/39; genes NF1 [2], PTPN11 [7], RAF1, SOS1 [2], SPRED1), growth plate disorders (8/39; genes ACAN, COL2A1, EXT2, FGFR3 [2], NPR2 [3]), and miscellaneous conditions (5/39; genes CDC42, LMNA, HMGA2, PMM2, RAI1). Genetically confirmed GHD patients presented with lower peak GH (median 1.8 vs. 4.8 [alternative genetic etiology] and 5.9 ug/L [no genetic etiology]; p=0.017), more frequent combined pituitary hormones deficiency (46% vs. 4% and 12%; p=0.001) and MRI midbrain abnormalities (73% vs. 14% vs. 32%; P=0.003). Conversely, the alternative etiology group demonstrated the least robust 5-years GH therapy response (median height gain 1.4 vs. 2.3 [GHD group] and 1.8 [No genetic etiology]; p=0.001). Conclusions Population of children clinically diagnosed with GHD is genetically heterogeneous. A significant proportion harbors defects in RAS-MAPK signaling or growth plate disorders, highlighting the limitations of current methods of GHD diagnostics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plachý et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: