Key result
Obesity phenotyping reveals women have higher fat mass and lower skeletal muscle mass than men.
Why the study?
Obesity heterogeneity by sex and age is crucial for precise risk stratification, but limited phenotyping obscures sex-specific risks and contributes to diagnostic and treatment disparities.
Do sex and age shape obesity phenotypes in adults with obesity?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,014)
Yes
Do sex and age shape obesity phenotypes in adults with obesity?
Sex and age strongly shape obesity phenotypes, with post-menopausal women facing accelerated metabolic deterioration and sarcopenia, highlighting the need for tailored screening.
Suggests caution applying BMI uniformly by sex in obesity; leaves open clinical utility of body composition metrics pending prospective research.
Introduction: Obesity heterogeneity by sex and age is crucial for precise risk stratification. Limited phenotyping obscures sex-specific risks and contributes to diagnostic and treatment disparities. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 1,014 adults with obesity (68% women; median age 50) from four Madrid Obesity Centers using a digital pathway (OB-DigiThum) including anthropometry, bioimpedance, biomarkers, and comorbidity screening. Fat mass (FM) and skeletal muscle mass (SMM) were normalised to body surface area (FM/BSA; SMM/BSA). Participants were stratified into four predefined sex- and age groups (female <50, female ≥50, male <50, male ≥50). Multidimensional phenotyping was performed using discriminant analysis and hierarchical clustering applied to standardized group-level mean profiles. Results: Women had higher FM/BSA and lower SMM/BSA than men (p<0.001), highlighting BMI’s limitations. With age, women’s BMI fell despite stable/increasing fat due to muscle loss (sarcopenic risk). Men showed more cardiometabolic disease overall, but post-menopausal women experienced sharp rises in type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia. Psychological distress was more frequent in women; bulimic behaviours appeared in younger men. Physical inactivity was common; Mediterranean diet adherence was relatively strong, especially in participants aged ≥50 years. The four sex- and age-stratified profiles showed distinct patterns in body composition, metabolic risk, and psychological burden, supporting differential risk stratification across groups. Conclusion: Sex and age strongly shape obesity phenotypes. Post-menopausal women face accelerated metabolic deterioration and sarcopenia. FM/BSA and SMM/BSA enhance risk profiling. Sex- and age-tailored metabolic, physical, and mental health screening should guide personalised management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vázquez et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=1,014). Multidimensional phenotyping (OB-DigiThum) was evaluated on Differences in fat mass and skeletal muscle mass normalized to body surface area between sexes (p=<0.001). Multidimensional phenotyping of adults with obesity revealed that women had significantly higher fat mass and lower skeletal muscle mass than men (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: