Autoethnography reveals emotional and psychological impacts in cancer survivorship, suggesting a patient-centered approach.
This study explored the critical role of lived experiences in shaping personal coping mechanisms, enhancing medical understanding, and enriching research methodologies, with a focus on cancer survivorship. Using an autoethnographic approach, the author, who was also the sole participant, documented her journey through cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship, offering a deeply personal perspective on the emotional, psychological, and practical challenges of living with and surviving cancer. Thematic analysis of the author’s narrative revealed key themes, including the emotional and psychological impact of survivorship, barriers to sharing lived experiences, the therapeutic benefits of storytelling, navigating identity and disability, uncertainty and unmet expectations, and the advocacy for documenting lived experiences. These findings highlighted the transformative power of personal narratives while addressing gaps in existing literature and practice. The study underscored the need for a more inclusive, patient-centered approach to healthcare and research, advocating for the systematic integration of lived experiences into policy, practice, and academic inquiry. By valuing and sharing lived experiences, this study contributed to a more empathetic and supportive healthcare environment, fostering resilience, connection, and well-being for individuals navigating serious illnesses. Keywords: Lived Experience, Cancer Survivorship, Autoethnography, Patient-Centered Care, Storytelling, Emotional Resilience, Psychological Impact, Healthcare Narratives, Survivorship Challenges, Patient Advocacy, Qualitative Research, Illness Narratives, Coping Mechanisms, Identity and Disability, Healthcare Policy
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cynthia Naa Anyimah Botchway (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: