Exploratory secondary analysis examines discomfort in ICU patients, highlighting the importance of comprehensive assessment.
BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition that ICU discomfort extends beyond pain, no study has empirically compared the proportion and interrelationships of psychological discomfort, physical discomfort and pain using clinically meaningful thresholds. AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between psychological discomfort, physical discomfort and pain based on patients' recalled discomfort reported within 24 h after ICU discharge. STUDY DESIGN: Patients completed the Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation (IPREA) questionnaire, a general discomfort visual analogue scale (VAS) and a general pain VAS (0-100 mm) anchored by 'no pain' and 'worst imaginable pain' within 24 h after ICU discharge from surgical, medical and cardiac ICUs of a tertiary hospital. A secondary analysis was conducted on the data, and IPREA items were grouped into three domains: psychological discomfort, physical discomfort without pain and pain. Descriptive and inferential statistics examined relationships between the three domains. The proportion of scores at the moderate threshold (40-69/100) and at or above the severe threshold (≥ 70/100) for pain, psychological and physical discomfort was determined. RESULTS: (2) = 16.84, p < 0.001); after Bonferroni correction, psychological discomfort versus pain remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: Discomfort in ICU patients extends beyond pain, underscoring the need for multidimensional nursing assessment. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Routine multidimensional assessment of discomfort can improve patient-centered ICU care and prevent misinterpretation of non-pain discomfort as pain. These findings reinforce the importance of incorporating psychological and physical discomfort assessments into daily ICU practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zarka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: