PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026Physics of Fluids0 citationsOpen Access

Statistical characterization of flow-blurring outflow regimes based on shadowgraph imaging

View Full Paper
EVErfan VaeziSMS. Amirreza S. MadaniSMSeyed Sorosh Mirfasihi

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize the behavior and transitions of flow-blurring atomization regimes under varying conditions.
  • Examined 486 operating conditions using high-speed shadowgraph imaging
  • Investigated three working fluids with distinct thermophysical properties
  • Analyzed three injector geometries with gap-to-orifice ratios H/D of 0.15, 0.2, and 0.25.
  • Identified four outflow regimes: Dripping, Kink, Transient Spray, and Developed Spray, with transitions influenced by multiple parameters.
  • Government compliance in regime occurrence found to require a coupled analysis of operating conditions and injector geometry.
  • Validation showed that effective regime classification depends on accounting for geometric effects.

Abstract

Flow-blurring injectors exhibit multiple outflow regimes whose transitions depend on the combined effects of operating conditions, fluid properties, and injector geometry. In this study, flow-blurring atomization is investigated experimentally using high-speed Shadowgraph Imaging Technique to systematically characterize regime behavior across a broad parameter space. A total of 486 operating conditions are examined using three working fluids with distinct thermophysical properties and three injector geometries with gap-to-orifice ratios H/D∈0. 15, 0. 2, 0. 25. Four distinct outflow regimes, namely, Dripping, Kink, Transient Spray, and Developed Spray, are consistently identified, forming an ordered progression in atomization intensity and flow unsteadiness. Statistical analysis of the operating dimensionless parameters shows that regime transitions cannot be uniquely described using individual operating variables, as substantial overlap persists, particularly for intermediate regimes. Class-conditioned univariate and bivariate probability density functions indicate that regime occurrence is governed by coupled variations in multiple parameters and is strongly influenced by injector geometry. Dimensionality and redundancy assessments further support the feasibility of representing regime transitions along a reduced coordinate, while validation across injector geometries highlights the importance of explicitly accounting for geometric effects to achieve transferable regime descriptions. The results provide an experimental basis for regime classification in flow-blurring atomization and offer guidance for injector design and operating-condition selection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vaezi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002191c8f74e3340f9c7c1https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0323772
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Flow regime transitions in flow blurring injection through a CFD parametric study2025
  2. 2Characterization of spray atomization for liquid jets in swirling crossflows2025
  3. 3Flow Focusing and Flow-Blurring: The In-Between Regime2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Effect of Cracking Pressure and Flow Split Ratio on the Atomization Performance of Dual-Orifice Injectors2024
  5. 5A Modal Analysis of Spray Structures From a Transversely Injected Liquid Jet in Subsonic and Supersonic Crossflows2024