Commentary discusses the impact of innovative policies on postsecondary education for incarcerated youth, suggesting positive outcomes.
Carceral settings are particularly harmful for youth development and substantially impede their ability to pursue postsecondary education, a key determinant of health and protective factor against future legal system involvement. This article provides a review of innovative legislation that eliminated California's state-level Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) and incentivizes county-based, less restrictive programs (LRPs). In addition to discussing the national and state context for the policy changes, our community-research partnership identifies strengths and opportunities for the LRP model to support community reintegration and a pathway to success with postsecondary education for incarcerated youth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pollard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: