Response to Ogden's model highlights a problematic split between being and knowing in psychoanalytic theory, suggesting deeper integration is necessary.
framework (2019) as a prominent example, I argue that a subtle idealization and reification of the experiential aspects of our work may shut down space for thought. Through close comparison of Ogden's framework with those articulated by Winnicott and Bion, I will contend that the inextricability of being and knowing is central to the psychoanalytic project, and that the contemporary focus on experience, as represented by Ogden, enacts a split between the two that paradoxically makes it more difficult to attend to all that experience entails.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannah Wallerstein (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: