PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2022The Journal of Technology Transfer260 citationsOpen Access

Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed

MOMichèle O’DwyerRFRaffaele FilieriLOLisa O’Malley

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract University–Industry Collaboration networks are increasingly significant to national economies. Previous studies have identified barriers and enablers of University–Industry Collaborations, however our understanding of the evolution of such collaborations is still limited thereby restricting our ability to nurture their development. This study explores the establishment of a successful University–Industry Collaboration and considers a range of perceived barriers and enablers through four emergent evolutionary phases: embryonic, initiation, engagement and established . The study adopted a qualitative research approach using a single site case study, focusing on the pharmaceutical industry, with 10 multinational firms and 8 academic institutions involved in a pharmaceutical collaboration. The results demonstrate that specific University–Industry Collaboration barriers and enablers emerge at different points in time, for example, strong lack of trust; strong fear of knowledge leakage, reluctance to share in the embryonic phase evolve to achieving integrity based trust and an intellectual property agreement in the engagement phase. These barriers were overcome using a range of phase appropriate mechanisms, for example, prior experience of the partners was critical in the embryonic phase, while cohesiveness and knowledge complementarity were vital in the engagement phase. The study emphasizes the significance of public funding and its distribution among members in order to support industry evolution and competitiveness. The University–Industry Collaboration continues to attract new participants and additional network-specific investments and has become a global centre of excellence for pharmaceutical research and development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

O’Dwyer et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002bc72ff633f36577d51ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09932-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems2006 · 398 citations
  2. 2ACADEMIC-PRACTITIONER COLLABORATION IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A CASE OF CROSS-PROFESSION COLLABORATION.2001 · 495 citations
  3. 3Qualitative Marketing Research2001 · 1,360 citations
  4. 4Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study2002 · 1,707 citations
  5. 5University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization2017 · 267 citations