Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The potential benefits of extended-interval dosing (EID) of rituximab (RTX) or ocrelizumab (OCR) in mitigating the reduction of immunoglobulin levels and decreasing the risk of infection in persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS) remain largely unknown. We retrospectively analyzed two structured data collections including pwRRMS who were prescribed RTX/OCR using different interval dosing regimens, a 6-month standard-interval dosing (SD) or EID. The SD and EID cohorts included 88 and 271 pwRRMS, respectively, with a mean (SD) treatment duration of 3.5 (1.3) and 4.4 (1.5) years, and a mean (SD) interval between infusions of 6.4 (1.7) and 19.2 (11.9) months. After RTX/OCR initiation, the two cohorts did not differ in time to first relapse (p = 0.83), time to first sustained accumulation of disability (p = 0.98) and incidence of MRI activity (p = 0.91). The time to first severe infectious event (SIE) was shorter in the SD cohort (p = 0.005). The effect of treatment duration on reduction of serum IgG level was lower in the EID cohort (Estimate = 0.15 g/L per year of follow-up, 95 % CI -0.06, -0.23, p = 0.001). In the entire patient group, higher serum IgG levels at the last infusion were associated with a lower risk of SIE between two visits (HR = 0.77 per g/L of serum IgG; 95 % CI: 0.66-0.91; p = 0.006). This study suggests that EID of RTX/OCR may reduce the risk of serum IgG decline in pwRRMS without a loss of efficacy and may mitigate the risk of severe infections. These results must be confirmed by future randomized studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rigollet et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: