We argue that several apparently distinct responses to the hole argument, all invoking formal or mathematical considerations, should be viewed as a unified “mathematical response.” We then consider and rebut two prominent critiques of the mathematical response before reflecting on what is ultimately at issue in this literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bradley et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: