BACKGROUND: Excisional biopsies are typically used to diagnose lymphoma, but data suggest that endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is equally effective. In this study, we determined whether EBUS-TBNA could accurately diagnose and subtype lymphoma. METHODS: The cases of patients who had undergone EBUS-TBNA for suspected lymphoma were retrospectively reviewed. EBUS-TBNA results were categorized as lymphoma, specific nonlymphoma diagnosis, granulomatous inflammation, or adequate or inadequate lymphocytes with no specific diagnosis. To quantify the ability of EBUS-TBNA to diagnose lymphoma, we used likelihood ratios. To quantify the ability of EBUS-TBNA to diagnose and subtype lymphoma, we calculated sensitivity and specificity. For this analysis, lymphoma that could be subtyped on the basis of EBUS-TBNA was classified as a true positive; lymphoma that could not be subtyped was classified as a false negative. RESULTS: Of the 181 patients included, 75 (41.5%) were ultimately diagnosed with lymphoma. EBUS-TBNA was able to establish a diagnosis of lymphoma in 63 patients (84%). Granulomatous inflammation diagnosed on the basis of EBUS-TBNA was associated with a low likelihood of lymphoma being present (likelihood ratio, 0.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00-0.276). Adequate lymphocytes were associated with a low likelihood of lymphoma (LR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.49). EBUS-TBNA was able to establish a diagnosis and subtype the lymphoma in 67% (95% CI, 0.45-0.88) of patients with de novo lymphoma and 81% (95% CI, 0.70-0.91) of patients with relapsed lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: EBUS-TBNA is an effective, minimally invasive diagnostic test for patients with suspected lymphoma and can provide valuable clinical information, even with "negative" results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grosu et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: