PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2012American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine250 citationsOpen Access

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Clinically Meaningful Primary Endpoints in Phase 3 Clinical Trials

View Full Paper
GRGanesh RaghuHCHarold R. CollardKAKevin J. Anstrom

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Definitive evidence of clinical efficacy in a Phase 3 trial is best shown by a beneficial impact on a clinically meaningful endpoint-that is, an endpoint that directly measures how a patient feels (symptoms), functions (the ability to perform activities in daily life), or survives. In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), we believe the endpoints that best meet these criteria are all-cause mortality and all-cause nonelective hospitalization. There are no validated measures of symptoms or broader constructs such as health status or functional status in IPF. A surrogate endpoint is defined as an indirect measure that is intended to substitute for a clinically meaningful endpoint. Surrogate endpoints can be appropriate outcome measures if validated. However, validation requires substantial evidence that the effect of an intervention on a clinically meaningful endpoint is reliably predicted by the effect of an intervention on the surrogate endpoint. For patients with IPF, there are currently no validated surrogate endpoints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raghu et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00be422ff633f365781299https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201201-0006pp
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper