Why the study?
Does CT measurement characterize glenoid erosion differences between rheumatoid, osteoarthritic, and normal shoulders?
Does CT measurement characterize glenoid erosion differences between rheumatoid, osteoarthritic, and normal shoulders?
CT imaging provides detailed characterization of glenoid erosion patterns in rheumatoid and osteoarthritic shoulders, which has important implications for planning total shoulder replacements.
CT glenoid measurements delineate RA versus OA erosion patterns; hypothesis-generating for implant planning and requires prospective outcome validation.
We studied serial CT scans of 45 arthritic shoulders (34 rheumatoid, 11 osteoarthritic) and 19 normal shoulders, making measurements at three levels on axial images. The maximum anteroposterior diameter of the glenoid was increased in rheumatoid glenoids at the upper and middle levels by 6 mm and in osteoarthritic glenoids at all levels by 5 to 8 mm as compared with normal. In rheumatoid cases, nearly half the available surface of the glenoid was of unsupported bone, mainly posteriorly at the upper and middle levels. In osteoarthritic glenoids, the best supported bone was anterior at the upper level and central at the middle and lower levels. The depth of the rheumatoid glenoid was reduced by a mean of 6 mm at the upper and middle levels and by 3 mm at the lower level. This inclined the surface of the glenoid superiorly. The depth at the middle level in osteoarthritis was reduced by a mean of 5 mm, suggesting central protrusion. Osteoarthritic glenoids were retroverted by a mean of 12.5 degrees, but of rheumatoid glenoids two-thirds were retroverted (mean 15.1 degrees) and one-third anteverted (mean 8.2 degrees). Our findings have important implications for the planning and placement of the glenoid component of total shoulder replacements; CT can provide useful information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mullaji et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: