Why the study?
Mental stress contributes to cardiovascular disease, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unclear.
Does acute mental stress drive vascular inflammation and promote plaque destabilization in atherosclerosis?
Does acute mental stress drive vascular inflammation and promote plaque destabilization in atherosclerosis?
Acute mental stress rapidly amplifies inflammatory leucocyte expansion inside atherosclerotic lesions via norepinephrine signaling, providing a mechanistic link between stress and plaque vulnerability.
Does not support clinical stress interventions yet; leaves open norepinephrine pathways for human atherosclerosis trials.
AIMS: Mental stress substantially contributes to the initiation and progression of human disease, including cardiovascular conditions. We aim to investigate the underlying mechanisms of these contributions since they remain largely unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here, we show in humans and mice that leucocytes deplete rapidly from the blood after a single episode of acute mental stress. Using cell-tracking experiments in animal models of acute mental stress, we found that stress exposure leads to prompt uptake of inflammatory leucocytes from the blood to distinct tissues including heart, lung, skin, and, if present, atherosclerotic plaques. Mechanistically, we found that acute stress enhances leucocyte influx into mouse atherosclerotic plaques by modulating endothelial cells. Specifically, acute stress increases adhesion molecule expression and chemokine release through locally derived norepinephrine. Either chemical or surgical disruption of norepinephrine signalling diminished stress-induced leucocyte migration into mouse atherosclerotic plaques. CONCLUSION: Our data show that acute mental stress rapidly amplifies inflammatory leucocyte expansion inside mouse atherosclerotic lesions and promotes plaque vulnerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hinterdobler et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: