Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Clinicians can better contextualize RCT applicability by design type; leaves open standardization of pragmatic criteria in cardiovascular research.
This Guide to Statistics article compares pragmatic randomized controlled trials, which focus on important challenges that patients, physicians, and policy makers face in day-to-day life with explanatory trials that seek to test a hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sox et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: