Key result
Pulmonary hypertension is associated with ~40-msec shorter pulsed Doppler RVOT acceleration time.
Why the study?
Noninvasive methods to estimate pulmonary artery pressure were needed to evaluate pulmonary hypertension.
Does a pulsed Doppler technique of the right ventricular outflow tract accurately estimate pulmonary artery pressure noninvasively in adults?
Observational (n=33)
Does a pulsed Doppler technique of the right ventricular outflow tract accurately estimate pulmonary artery pressure noninvasively in adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 97% vs 137%
p-value: p=<.01
Pulsed Doppler evaluation of right ventricular outflow tract flow velocity patterns provides a reliable noninvasive method for estimating pulmonary artery pressure.
May support noninvasive pulmonary pressure estimation by RVOT Doppler; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
We used a pulsed Doppler technique to examine the flow velocity pattern in the right ventricular outflow tract in 33 adults. In the patients with normal pulmonary artery pressure (mean pressure less than 20 mm Hg, 16 patients), ejection flow reached a peak level at midsystole (137 +/- 24 msec, mean +/- SD), producing a domelike contour of the flow velocity pattern during systole. In contrast, the flow velocity pattern in patients with pulmonary hypertension (mean pressure greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg, 17 patients) was demonstrated to accelerate rapidly and to reach a peak level sooner (97 +/- 20 msec, p less than .01); in 10 of the pulmonary hypertensive patients a secondary slower rise in flow velocity was observed during a deceleration, resulting in the midsystolic notching. The time to peak flow (acceleration time, AcT) and right ventricular ejection time (RVET) were measured from the flow velocity pattern. Either AcT or AcT/RVET decreased with increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure, and a very high correlation (r = -.90) was found between AcT/RVET and log10 (mean pulmonary artery pressure). The use of this technique permitted the noninvasive estimation of the pulmonary artery pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitabatake et al. (1983) conducted an observational in Pulmonary hypertension (n=33). Pulmonary hypertension vs. Normal pulmonary artery pressure was evaluated on Time to peak flow (acceleration time, AcT) (p=<.01). Pulsed Doppler evaluation demonstrated a significantly shorter time to peak flow in patients with pulmonary hypertension versus those with normal pressure (97 vs 137 msec; p<.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: