Bone age assessment (BAA) on hand radiographs is a frequent and time consuming task in radiology. We present a method for (semi)automatic BAA which is done in several steps: (i) extract 14 epiphyseal regions from the radiographs, (ii) for each region, retain image features using the IRMA framework, (iii) use these features to build a classifier model (training phase), (iv) evaluate performance on cross validation schemes (testing phase), (v) classify unknown hand images (application phase). In this paper, we combine a support vector machine (SVM) with cross-correlation to a prototype image for each class. These prototypes are obtained choosing one random hand per class. A systematic evaluation is presented comparing nominal- and real-valued SVM with k nearest neighbor (kNN) classification on 1,097 hand radiographs of 30 diagnostic classes (0 19 years). Mean error in age prediction is 1.0 and 0.83 years for 5-NN and SVM, respectively. Accuracy of nominal- and real-valued SVM based on 6 prominent regions (prototypes) is 91.57% and 96.16%, respectively, for accepting about two years age range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harmsen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: