Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 6, 2021Annals of HematologyOpen Access

Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LWLiwen WangCentral South UniversityHXHongxian XiangErasmus MCYYYuhan YanNanjing Tech University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0101feef8139f8ff77b6ddhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-020-04376-w
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparable engraftment kinetics following peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma.1998 · 159 citations
  2. 2Cyclophosphamide‐based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma2014 · 57 citations
  3. 3Cancer statistics, 20202020 · 21,495 citations