Evolutionary correlations among morphology, habitat use and clinging performance in Caribbean Anolis lizards

A central issue in evolutionary biology concerns whether morphology, performance and habitat use have coevolved. We investigated evolutionary relationships among the size of the subdigital toepad, clinging ability and perch height in 12 species of Caribbean Anolis lizard. Specifically, we predicted that: (1) because larger anole species tend to perch high in the canopy, both toepad area and clinging ability should scale with positive allometry to enable small and large lizards to possess approximately similar ratios of both variables relative to mass; (2) anole species with relatively larger toepads (i.e. size-adjusted) should be relatively better clingers compared with species with relatively small toepads; (3) species that perch high in the canopy should possess relatively large clinging abilities (either on an absolute or a size-adjusted basis). Our first hypothesis was refuted, as both toepad area and clinging ability scaled close to isometry (0.67) relative to mass, indicating that large lizard species have low ratios of clinging ability to mass compared with small lizard species. However, our second and third predictions were confirmed. Anole species with relatively larger toepads were relatively better clingers compared with species with relatively smaller toepads. Anole species that perched high in the canopy (either on an absolute scale or relative to size) tended to have relatively larger toepads and greater clinging capacities compared with species that perched lower in the canopy. These data provide indirect comparative evidence that the evolution of increased toepad size in some anole species is adaptive, by facilitating the occupation of perches high in the canopy.