Lithium iron phosphate is a promising candidate material for Li-Ion batteries. In this study, the rate determining processes are assessed in more detail in order to separate performance limiting factors. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of experimental LiFePO4/Lithium-cells are deconvoluted by the method of distribution of relaxation times (DRT), what necessitates a pre-processing of the capacitive branch. This results in a separation into cathode and anode polarization processes and in a proposition of a physically motivated equivalent circuit model. We identify three different polarization processes of the LiFePO4-cathode (i) solid state diffusion, (ii) charge transfer (cathode/electrolyte) and (iii) contact resistance (cathode/current collector). Our model is then applied to EIS data sets covering varied temperature (0° to 30°C) and state of charge (10% to 100%). Activation energy, polarization resistance and frequency range are determined separately for all cathode processes involved. Finally, the tape-casted LiFePO4–cathode sheet is modified in porosity, thickness and contact area between cathode/electrolyte and cathode/current collector by a calendering process. Charge transfer resistance and contact resistance respond readily in polarization and relaxation frequency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Illig et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: