Why the study?
Does preoperative vascular imaging predict the need for intraoperative modification of peripheral arterial cannulation in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery?
Does preoperative vascular imaging predict the need for intraoperative modification of peripheral arterial cannulation in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery?
Preoperative vascular imaging identifying a femoral artery diameter of less than 7.3 mm strongly predicts the need for modifying peripheral arterial cannulation strategy during minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.
Preoperative femoral measurement may inform cannulation planning in minimally invasive mitral surgery; hypothesis-generating for routine imaging-guided strategies.
OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using peripheral cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) is increasingly prevalent. Although conceptually straightforward, peripheral CBP involves challenges and risks specific to this method of perfusion. The utility of preoperative vascular imaging in predicting these technical challenges and preventing vascular complications was studied. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 73 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using femorofemoral CBP with intraluminal aortic occlusion balloon catheter. All patients underwent preoperative computed tomography angiogram or magnetic resonance angiography to study the iliofemoral axes. RESULTS: None of the patients operated with this technique was found to have arterial stenoses. Patients with a femoral artery diameter of less than 7.3 mm needed bilateral or side-graft arterial cannulation significantly more frequently than patients with larger femoral arteries (46.2% vs 9.1%, P = 0.001). There was a trend toward more frequent modification of arterial cannulation strategy in patients with body surface area less than 1.7 m compared with larger patients (body surface area, 1.7-2.0) (26.3% vs 8.3%, P = 0.07). Patients needing high CBP flow rate (>5 L/min) were no more likely to need dual arterial cannulation (18.2% vs 19.1%, P = 0.68). No patient experienced a vascular complication. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that preoperative vascular imaging and patient evaluation may predict difficulties with femoral cannulation and perfusion, which can lead to better preoperative planning and potentially prevent vascular complications. Further data will be accumulated and analyzed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosu et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: