This article considers the product of self-deception. Many assume, or argue, that the product of self-deception is a belief. I argue against this being a general truth by outlining some of the ways in which the self-deceived can be deeply conflicted, such that there is no fact of the matter concerning what they believe. These situations are not adequately addressed by many accounts of self-deception. Further, I argue that this task requires going beyond our folk psychological classifications. 1 Deeply Conflicted Self-Deceivers and a Sta-tic Problem It would be nice if theorists interested in self-deception could start with an agreed upon understanding of the phenomenon — what it even means to be self-deceived and what are some of its paradigm examples — and then proceed from that starting point to address the various theoretical problems
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric Funkhouser (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: