Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
μm) in microfluidic devices with larger channel sizes (up to 1000 μm). In particular as channel size was increased, fluid density differences became more influential in geometric control. We found that two parameters, narrowing ratio (junction diameter over outlet diameter) and flow fraction (discrete phase flow rate over total flow rate), were critical in adjusting the capillary number, modulation of which has been previously shown to enable control over microspheroid diameter and axial ratio. By changing the device design and the experimental conditions, we exploited the relationship between these parameters to predictably modulate microspheroid geometric shape. Finally, we demonstrated the applicability to tissue engineering through encapsulation of fibroblasts and endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) in hydrogel microspheroids with different axial ratios and negligible loss of cell viability. This study advances microfluidic production of large cell-laden microspheroids (microspheres and microrods) with controllable size and geometry, opening the door for further investigation of geometric shape-related biomedical applications such as engineered tissue formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: