This article examines the history of the ubiquitous Russian Avtomat Kalashnikova assault rifle (AK). Does it possess systemic characteristics that predispose its subversion from its intended purpose? The invention lineage of automatic weapons is considered in parallel with developments in the social organization of warfare. The AK is then evaluated in this context. In both technical and social terms, the use of the weapon by insurgents or in developing countries is not as remote from its intended function as would initially appear to be the case. Moreover, it is argued, the success of the AK is largely a result of the fact that it is a counter example to the prevailing episteme of technological progress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Graves‐Brown (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: