OBJECTIVES: to determine the prevalence of three independent, disability-free and operationally defined frailty phenotypes and the associated risk of mortality in a community-dwelling older people cohort over 74 years of age. METHODS: observational, prospective and population-based design. Bio-psycho-social variables were assessed using a range of standardised instruments. The physical frailty phenotype (PFP), mental frailty phenotype (MFP) and social frailty phenotype (SFP) were operationally defined using a deficit accumulation model that excluded disability. Logistic regression analyses explored associations of the frailty phenotypes with sex, age and marital status, and a Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between frailty phenotypes and mortality. RESULTS: of the eligible individuals, 82% (n = 875) participated. The prevalence of any frailty phenotype in an individual was 38.8%; 17.3% exhibited the PFP, 20.2% exhibited the MFP, and 8.9% exhibited the SPF. Older and female were more likely to exhibit the PFP, and widowhood was associated with the SFP. The hazard ratios of mortality were 3.09 (95% CI = 1.54-6.17) for the PFP and 2.69 (95% CI = 1.01-7.25) for the SFP. CONCLUSION: three different disability-free frailty phenotypes were differentially related to the socio-demographical characteristics of sex, age and marital status and independently predicted risk of mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garre‐Olmo et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: