Quasi-biennial statistical coupling reveals dynamic interactions between solar flares and CMEs during solar maximum, suggesting complex underlying processes.
Understanding whether solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) share a common physical driver or represent distinct eruptive phenomena remains a central challenge in solar physics. This study investigates the statistical coupling between the temporal occurrences of class ≥C1.0 flares and CMEs during the maximum phase of Solar Cycle 23 (1998−2003). To eliminate biases arising from their vastly different macroscopic occurrence rates, the analysis evaluates the local clustering dynamics of the events using the normalized interarrival stochastic variable h . A two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test is subsequently applied to assess the statistical indistinguishability of the underlying temporal processes. While a static, global evaluation indicates completely decoupled statistics over the 6 yr period, a time-resolved analysis utilizing a sliding window uncovers a highly structured, quasi-biennial oscillation (∼2 yr) in the flare-CME similarity strength. Crucially, kinematic filtering reveals an energy-dependent phase inversion: epochs demonstrating robust statistical similarity between flares and the general CME population become strictly decoupled when only fast CMEs (≳900 km s −1 ) are considered, and vice versa. These findings indicate that the “common cause” hypothesis is not a permanent condition but a highly dynamic, conditional state. The quasi-biennial modulation of the statistical similarity is interpreted within the context of the double dynamo theory and the Gnevyshev Gap, suggesting that the deep-seated oscillatory modes of the solar magnetic cycle fundamentally dictate the varying topological complexity required to synchronize radiative outbursts and energetic plasma ejections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Telloni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: