Reliable comparison of collision cross section (CCS) measurements across ion mobility platforms remains a key challenge for standardized molecular identification. We present a hierarchical, data-driven postcalibration correction framework that harmonizes CCS values across drift tube (DTIMS), trapped ion mobility (TIMS), and traveling wave (TWIMS) instruments, enabling quantitative cross-technology comparison despite differing calibration methods. Using a multilaboratory dataset of 840 measurements for 347 compounds, the framework reduced intertechnology CCS variability by approximately 95%, bringing residual differences within instrumental precision limits. Leave-one-compound-out validation demonstrated robust cross-technology transfer, lowering the median absolute percentage error from 8.9% to 3.2% and achieving 94.6% empirical coverage of 95% prediction intervals. The approach requires as few as three reference compounds, reducing recalibration workload by more than half, and provides full uncertainty estimates for probability-based database matching. This statistically grounded yet practical strategy enables harmonized, uncertainty-aware CCS databases and supports reproducible compound identification across laboratories and ion mobility technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: