Evaluates BREAST-Q outcomes in transgender women, suggesting sociodemographic factors influence satisfaction.
Purpose: Sociodemographic factors are associated with disparities in postoperative outcomes after gender-affirming surgery, yet their relationship with patient-reported outcomes after gender-affirming breast augmentation remains unclear.We evaluated associations between patient-level and structural factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among transgender women after breast augmentation.Methods: Patients who underwent gender-affirming breast augmentation from 2015 to 2023 at two affiliated institutions, a county safety-net hospital and an academic medical center, were recruited to complete a postoperative BREAST-Q Augmentation Module survey 12 months after surgery.Six subscales were analyzed.Univariate linear regression was used to assess associations between sociodemographic, clinical, and surgical factors and BREAST-Q scores.Results: Among 270 eligible patients, 65 (24 %) completed the BREAST-Q 1 year postaugmentation.Surgeries performed at the county hospital correlated with lower satisfaction with breasts ( = -15.45;p = 0.032), psychosocial well-being ( = -15.46;p = 0.042), and physical well-being ( = -14.23;p = 0.002) compared to procedures performed at the academic setting.Current tobacco use at the pre-operative visit was associated with lower postoperative psychosocial well-being ( = -23.78;p = 0.028).Severe obesity (BMI 35 kg/m) was linked to lower implant satisfaction ( = -1.66;p = 0.013).Black patients reported higher sexual wellbeing compared with non-Hispanic White patients ( = +25.67;p = 0.016).No significant associations were found between other sociodemographic factors, surgical variables (implant size, shape, texture, incision), complications, or race/ethnicity for the remaining BREAST-Q subscales.Conclusion: After gender-affirming breast augmentation, patient-reported satisfaction and wellbeing among transgender women undergoing breast augmentation appear to be shaped more by structural context and patient-level factors rather than by the technical factors of the operation alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rouhani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: