Descriptive cross-sectional study finds high substance use prevalence in youth, indicating urgent need for prevention strategies.
This study assessed the prevalence, determinants, and effects of substance abuse among youths aged 19–35 years in Zone #4 Community, Pleebo City, Maryland County, Liberia. The study is significant as it provides evidence-based data on substance use patterns to inform policymakers, health practitioners, and community leaders in designing effective prevention and intervention strategies. A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed. The study population consisted of 534 youths, from which 223 respondents were selected using Epi Info version 7.2.6.0 at a 95% confidence level and 5% margin of error. Systematic random sampling was used, and data were collected using structured questionnaires. Analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel and presented using descriptive statistics. Findings revealed a very high prevalence of substance use among respondents, with marijuana (31%), alcohol (29%), and cigarettes/tobacco (28%) being the most commonly used substances. Most respondents (83%) reported daily use, and 78% used substances in peer groups. The majority were male (85%), aged 25–30 years (41%), single (91%), unemployed (61%), and had completed senior secondary education (39%). Key determinants of substance abuse included peer pressure (43%), stress or depression (33%), family influence (93% reported family members who use substances), easy accessibility (67%), and unemployment or poverty (89%). The effects of substance abuse were wide-ranging, including physical health issues such as fatigue (60%), mental health challenges including stress (41%), depression (30%), and anxiety (29%), as well as social consequences such as isolation (38%) and family conflict (27%). Behavioral impacts included aggression (55%), risky decision-making (19%), and reduced productivity (45%). In conclusion, substance abuse among youths in the study area is highly prevalent and driven by social, economic, and environmental factors, leading to significant health and social consequences. The study recommends community-based awareness programs, youth empowerment initiatives, improved access to counseling and rehabilitation services, and stricter regulation of substance availability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Effort Wesseh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: