Evaluates milling protocol impacts on crown adaptation, marginal quality, and occlusal quality, suggesting protocol importance.
OBJECTIVES: Variables related to CAD/CAM processing can affect the final quality of all-ceramic crowns. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the milling protocol on the adaptation, marginal and occlusal quality of monolithic zirconia crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine monolithic zirconia crowns were produced using three CAD/CAM milling protocols (n = 13): slow (S), normal (N), and fast (F). Adaptation (gap thickness) was evaluated using the replica technique, while marginal quality was assessed according to a severity scale. Occlusal quality was investigated qualitatively, using a stereomicroscope, and quantitatively, through an occlusal dimensional discrepancy analysis. Gap thickness and occlusal discrepancy data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's test, and marginal quality with Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Gap thickness in the marginal, gingival-axial angle and axial regions was similar among groups. In the axio-occlusal angle and occlusal region, group N presented the smallest gap. For marginal quality, group F had higher scores in the severity scale than groups N and S for the mesial and buccal regions. Group F crowns showed less refined occlusal anatomy. Yet, when crowns produced with S and F protocols were compared with N, the total mean discrepancy was similar. CONCLUSION: The CAD/CAM milling protocol affected the adaptation, marginal, and occlusal quality of monolithic zirconia crowns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bringhenti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: