Evaluates gilteritinib's effectiveness in inducing remission in children with FLT3-ITD AML, suggesting promising outcomes.
Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) occurs in ~15% of pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is associated with high relapse risk with conventional chemotherapy. Gilteritinib is a selective, next-generation FLT3 inhibitor (FLT3i) approved for adults with relapsed/refractory FLT3‑mutated AML, but pediatric-specific data remain limited. The multi-national phase 1/2 SKIPPER study evaluated gilteritinib combined with fludarabine and cytarabine chemotherapy and granulocyte colony‑stimulating factor (FLAG) in children and adolescents/young adults with relapsed/refractory FLT3‑ITD AML. Nine patients, aged 8-15 years, were enrolled in phase 1 of the study between 2020 and 2023. Recruitment challenges, including disease rarity, off‑label FLT3i availability, and competing trials, led to study termination after phase 1. The composite complete remission rate in the study population was 66.7% (95% confidence interval: 29.9%-92.5%). Two‑year event‑free and overall survival probability was 41.7% and 55.6%, respectively. Treatment‑emergent adverse events, most commonly reversible hepatic enzyme elevations and cytopenias, were consistent with known toxicity profiles of gilteritinib and FLAG. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable to those of adults, and pharmacodynamic plasma inhibitory activity assays confirmed sustained FLT3 inhibition. No dose‑limiting toxicities were observed, and the recommended phase 2 dose of gilteritinib was established at 2 mg/kg/day for patients ≥2 years old. The gilteritinib and FLAG regimen had manageable safety, induced high remission rates, and enabled allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for several patients. Although limited by a small sample size, these findings support further evaluation of gilteritinib in pediatric patients with FLT3-mutated AML, particularly in frontline settings (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04240002).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Connor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: