Examines wave-induced loads and fatigue in offshore structures, suggesting hydroelastic effects are critical.
• A coupled CFD-FEM framework is validated for predicting hydroelasticity of flexible support structures in irregular waves. • Structural flexibility significantly modifies wave-induced loads, amplifying higher-order harmonics and local accelerations. • Irregular wave excitation redistributes spectral energy, influencing extreme events and fatigue-critical stress cycles. • Hydroelastic effects increase cumulative fatigue damage by 78 limitations of rigid-body analyses. Offshore wind turbine foundations consist of slender cylindrical members whose fatigue life and ultimate strength are strongly influenced by wave-structure interactions. Accurate design requires consideration of hydroelastic effects, which are often neglected in rigid-body analyses. This study employs a fully coupled computational fluid dynamics–finite element (CFD-FEM) framework to examine the hydroelastic response of a top-fixed flexible cylinder in irregular waves. The model solves the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with nonlinear structural dynamics and is validated against experimental measurements of free-surface elevation, hydrodynamic forces, and structural accelerations. Results show that structural flexibility redistributes the spectral energy of wave-induced loads, introducing nonlinear coupling between the wave excitation and structural modes. The acceleration spectrum features a dominant peak at approximately three times the wave frequency and a secondary resonance near the first wet natural frequency. Statistical and fatigue analyses reveal that flexibility amplifies high-order force components and increases cumulative fatigue damage by about 78% compared with a rigid configuration. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating hydroelasticity in fatigue and reliability assessments of offshore wind turbine support structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: