Develops a machine-learning framework for non-performing loan valuation, suggesting effective predictive techniques.
Develops an integrated machine-learning framework for Italian NPL valuation, addressing three methodological gaps: (1) cross-validation leakage via purged CV with embargo periods; (2) high-cardinality categorical features (26 judicial districts) via LightGBM native categorical handling; (3) regulatory interpretability via SHAP global+local explanations. Six-model framework: AVM (R^2 = 0.50 OOT), recovery rate (R^2 = 0.73 OOT), Weibull recovery timing, share-of-wallet, unsecured-credit, and Nash-bargaining ZOPA. Synthetic dataset of 100,000 loans calibrated to Banca d'Italia, OMI, and Ministero della Giustizia aggregates. Median recovery time North: 25 months vs South: 70 months. Synthetic-data disclosure: results illustrative of the methodology; not empirical findings about actual portfolios. Path to real-data validation through Italian NPL servicer partnership documented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luka Stanisljevic (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: